How is the Option Market Lately?
We all know volatility is extremely low in option market, in
accompany with the extremely low realized volatility in equities. How is
the option overall doing? Does the low volatility cause the low trading volume
and eventually leads to the death of the option market, according to some
apocalyptic speculation?
If you look at the recently daily published OCC volume
number, it does show the pattern of the volume petering out, 13 – 15 million
contracts traded in equity single+ETF (non-index) category. In Figure 1, we show the monthly trading
volume since 2003. It does show the
volume flatten around 300 million per month since 2008.
A much more accurate measure of option trading activity,
especially when related to volatility, is a measurement first proposed by us,
the Volume-Vega or OpenInterest-Vega (OIVega).
It is basically the Vega calculated at the implied vol for the volume or
Open Interest. Figure 2 shows the
corresponding Volume-Vega trend.
Figure 1. Monthly
Equity Option Volume from Jan 2003 to August 2014 (the spike in August 2011 was
due to our Michael Corigliano joining BellCurve… or maybe due to the Congress
debt ceiling crisis.)
Figure 2. Monthly
Equity Option Volume-Vega.
If you squint your eyes, you may see somewhat an uptrend
since 2009, even though these two years the Volume-Vega is basically the same
as Volume, flatten out.
But here is a very upbeat chart that would wash away the
anemic feeling if you just look at the volume:
the number of equity options has been increasing steadily or even
rapidly in recent years. Figure 3 shows
the number of strikes in the entire US equity market (currently at 350K, the
number of options is double that number, 700K).
This is quite a change from the boom years of options in early 2000 when
there were typically 100K options in the market available to trade.
Such rapid increase is due to the two factors: 1. The
introduction of weekly options; 2. The
normalization of option symbolism in 2010 (which removed the archaic monthly cycle
symbol and the special symbolism for LEAPS options – anyone still remember the
chaotic process of LEAPS Conversion that the IT department used to have to go
through each year?) Such normalization
(through the standard OSI symbols) allows options to be efficiently defined and
managed, while options traders can focus entirely on the volatility or
strategic aspects of options.
The increase of total option strike count in US market comes
from two aspects: the steady (but
slower) increase of number of underlying symbols that have options (now stands
just above 4000), as shown in Figure 4; and the much rapidly increase of number of strikes per names (Figure 5).
So how can we reconcile the fact that total option volume is
anemic, while option products are growing rapidly and healthily? My explanation (which will be the subject of
more detail research in future) is, these days, with the advance of multiple
electronic exchanges and electronic trading tools and algo, there are
relatively fewer big concentrated trades in the option space, but more spread-out
small trades. These trades are more
concentrated around the at-the-money areas (thus bigger unit Vega) rather than
in more speculative way out-of-money options
(which has smaller unit Vega), thus explaining that the Volume-Vega is
actually showing a slight uptrend that does not exhibit in Volume history.
Figure 3. Number of
strikes in US equity option market.
Figure 4. Number of
US equity symbols with active options.
Currently over 4000.
Figure 5. Number of
strikes per symbol. Currently there are
about 90 strikes per symbol in average, or 180 options per equity name.
The implications of these trends are several. First, the option market is far from dead,
but flourishing through the recent normalization of symbolism and electronic
trading (which I described in a previous article).
Secondly, as active participants of option market, this is a
great opportunities that didn’t present in the previous generation of option
traders: we have now much wider and complete volatility surfaces to trade on,
and we have much more relativity opportunities in that space. Trade relative
vol, rather than absolute vol level, is the name of the game.
Thirdly, the technology and information providers like
Bloomberg need to realize this new reality and face up and catch up, rather
than live in the archaic world of 10 years ago when option traders typically
deal with 100,000 options in the entire universe, rather than more than half
million options like today.
Derek Wang, CEO, Bell Curve Capital LP. dwang at bellcurvecapital.com